Results from our HVAC work, read honestly

The results

The full set is published on the HVAC.Agency case studies page.

What transfers to a software or AI decision

Systems built from structured data

BoilerPart.ca runs on more than 2,000 programmatic pages. A system like that only works when the underlying data is clean, consistently structured and governed. The same discipline is what makes a CRM migration or an ERP rollout succeed: decide the data model, clean the records, then build. Our implementation oversight service applies that thinking to data migration checks.

Measurement that survives scrutiny

CombiBoiler.ca reached 300% ROI, and HVACDeal.ca recorded a 12:1 ROI. Figures like these depend on tracking a lead from first contact through to revenue, and agreeing what counts. That is exactly the work in our data and reporting service, where we write KPI definitions and reconcile dashboards with accounting.

Repeatable operations

HeatLand published more than 850 SEO articles. Producing at that volume needs a defined process, clear roles and checks at each step. Repetitive, rules-based work of that kind is also where AI and automation tend to pay back, which is the starting point of our AI adoption service.

What these results do not show

Honesty about limits is part of good advice, so here they are plainly:

• They do not show that we have selected a particular CRM or ERP for a client.
• They are not results for any sector other than HVAC.
• They do not predict what your business will achieve.

When you ask us about relevant experience in your sector, we will tell you directly what we have and have not done.

Why we publish adjacent results at all

A fair question is why an advisory practice would show web and lead-generation results instead of advisory outcomes. The answer is that these are the verified, public numbers we have, and each one links to a live site you can inspect yourself. We would rather show real work in a neighbouring field, clearly labelled, than invent advisory statistics or quote clients who cannot be checked.

There is also a practical link. Every one of these projects required decisions about platforms, integrations, tracking and data structure, made under budget pressure and then lived with for years. That is the same position an owner is in after choosing a CRM or a field-service system, and it is the experience we bring to the table.

How we will measure an engagement with you

Each proposal sets out measures that fit the work, agreed before we start. Examples:

• Selection: must-have requirements demonstrated; first-year cost within the modelled range; user adoption at 90 days.
• Roadmap: share of roadmap items delivered on schedule each quarter; software spend after rationalisation.
• AI adoption: hours saved per week against a recorded baseline; error rate after review.
• Reporting: dashboard revenue reconciling with accounting for a closed month.

We would rather report a modest, verified gain than an impressive figure nobody can check. To discuss what success would look like for your decision, see our services or text (604) 632-4959.